RSS Print Email

This blog is a service of Alston & Bird's Corporate Transactions and Securities practice and focuses on current issues and events relating to merger and acquisition activity in the U.S. and around the world. Our lawyers are experienced with a wide range of domestic and international business, regulatory and litigation issues in this arena.

Delaware Chancery Court Calls into Question Traditional Understanding of Anti-Assignment Provisions in Mergers

July 14, 2011 | Posted by steve.yoost@alston.com | Topic(s): Reverse Mergers, Contract Drafting

The M&A community is abuzz about Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, a recent Delaware Chancery Court opinion in an ongoing breach of contract dispute involving a reverse triangular merger (an “RTM”). In the opinion, Vice Chancellor Parsons denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim, because the court determined that an anti-assignment provision in a contract between the parties was ambiguous as to whether consent was required in the context of an RTM. This potentially far-reaching opinion may impact the way parties structure future deals as well as conduct business and legal due diligence during transactions. This case may also encourage parties to seek legal redress for potential breaches of anti-assignment provisions of contracts resulting from RTMs.

Read More