District Court
- Representing an enterprise technology company as the defendant in district court litigation related to networking and power-over-ethernet. (E.D. Tex.).
- Representing a consumer electronics company as the defendant in multiple district court litigations related to wireless connectivity solutions. (E.D. Tex.).
- Represented a telecommunications provider as the defendant in district court litigation related to digital subscriber line (DSL) technology. (E.D. Tex.).
- Represented a telecommunications company as the defendant in district court litigation relating to wireless routing technology. (E.D. Tex.).
- Represented a global technology corporation as the defendant and counter-plaintiff in a district court litigation relating to voice solutions. Voxware, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc., et al., No. 1:2023-cv-00052 (D. Del.).
- Represented a network infrastructure provider as the defendant in district court litigation relating to digital subscriber line (DSL) technology. TQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope., et al., No. 2:21-cv-00310 (E.D. Tex.).
- Represented a telecommunications company as the defendant in district court litigation relating to digital subscriber line (DSL) technology. (E.D. Tex.).
- Represented a national real estate brokerage as the defendant in a district court litigation relating to 3D virtual tour technology. (W.D. Tex.).
- Represented a global technology corporation as plaintiff in district court litigation involving various barcode scanning technologies. Honeywell Int’l Inc. et al. v. Zebra Techs. Corp., et al., No. 6:22-cv-00442 (W.D. Tex.); Honeywell Int’l Inc. et al. v. Zebra Techs. Corp., et al., No. 6:22-cv-00517 (W.D. Tex.).
International Trade Commission
- Represented an electronics manufacturing company as the respondent in an ITC investigation involving active cable solutions. Certain Active Electrical Cables and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1446 (ITC).
- Represented a multinational computer and electronics manufacturer as the respondent in an ITC investigation involving Wi-Fi related technology. Certain Electronic Computer Devices and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1382 (ITC).
- Represented a global technology corporation as the complainant in an ITC investigation involving various barcode scanning technologies. Barcode Scanners, Scan Engines, Mobile Computers with Barcode Scanning Functionalities, No. 337-TA-1321 (ITC); Certain Barcode Scanners, Scan Engines, Mobile Computers with Barcode Scanning Functionalities, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof, No. 337-TA-1317 (ITC).
- Represented a global technology corporation as the complainant in an ITC investigation involving various barcode scanning technologies. Certain Barcode Scanners, Scan Engines, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof, No. 337-TA-1165 (ITC).
Appellate Court
- Representing a utilities company as the appellee at the Federal Circuit. Shamoon v. City of San Antonio, No. 26-1193 (Fed. Cir.).
- Representing a multinational computer and electronics manufacturer as the intervenor-appellee in an ITC investigation involving Wi-Fi related technology. Lenovo (United States) Inc. v. ITC, 25-2030 (Fed. Cir.).
- Represented a consumer electronics company as the intervenor-appellee at the Federal Circuit. Roku, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 24-1188 (Fed. Cir.).
- Represented a medical equipment provider as the appellant at the Federal Circuit. Abiomed, Inc. v. Maquet Cardiovascular LLC, No. 24-1062 (Fed. Cir.); Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed, Inc., No. 23-2045 (Fed. Cir.).
- Represented a lithium-ion battery manufacturer as the appellee at the Federal Circuit. Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Tech. Ltd., No. 23-2285, -2256, -2257, -2258 (Fed. Cir.).
- Represented a telecommunications company as the appellee at the Federal Circuit. (Fed. Cir.).
- Represented a consumer electronics company as the intervenor-appellee at the Federal Circuit. Roku, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 22-1386 (Fed. Cir.).