Karlee Wroblewski

• Representing global telecommunications companies against an Ivy League university regarding WiFi technology. Cornell University et al v. AT&T Inc. et al, Case No. 2:25-cv-00054 (E.D. Tex.); Cornell University et al v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, 2:25-cv-00055 (E.D. Tex.).
• Representing a firm specializing in telecommunications, wireless communications, and technology against a major technology company regarding mobile payment systems. Telcom Ventures LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, 2:24-cv-00691 (E.D. Tex.).
• Represented an action camera company in its trial against a former competitor after ten years of representation by another firm. Despite a prior finding of infringement, secured an ultimate victory of no liability for the client. Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc., 3:17-cv-04738 (N.D. Cal.).
• Represented a multinational telecommunications company in numerous litigation matters involving switches, routers, and optical pluggables. Correct Transmission v. Nokia, No. 2:22-cv-00343-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.). Obtained a successful trial verdict of noninfringement of three patents and a favorable resolution. NextGen v. Nokia, No. 2:22-cv-309, No. 2:23-cv-00637 (E.D. Tex.); Iarnach v. AT&T and Nokia, 2:23-cv-231 (E.D. Tex.); TQ Delta v. Nokia, No. 2:21-cv-309 (E.D. Tex.).
• Represented a global telecommunications company against a major technology company regarding 5G technology. Obtained a final determination of a violation and a successful outcome for the Complainant. In the Matter of Certain Mobile Phones, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1375 (ITC).
• Represented a telecommunications infrastructure company in litigation involving DSL technologies. Obtained a favorable trial verdict. TQ Delta v. CommScope, No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.).
• Represented a national real estate company in litigation involving 3D home tour technology. Obtained a successful trial verdict of noninfringement and invalidity of four asserted patents. Surefield v. Redfin, No. 6:20-cv-00376 (W.D. Tex.).
• Represented a multinational lighting corporation against a large state university system regarding LED lighting. Obtained a successful hearing determination of no infringement and invalidity of the asserted patents. In the Matter of Certain Filament Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1220 (ITC).
• Represented a global engineering and manufacturing company regarding water heater blowers. Obtained a successful hearing determination of no infringement of the asserted patents. In the Matter of Certain Blowers and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1217 (ITC).
• Represented a multinational technology company in an International Trade Commission litigation relating to wearable technology. Obtained a successful hearing determination of no infringement and invalidity of the asserted patents. In the Matter of Certain Wearable Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1190 (ITC).
• Represented a national telecommunications carrier in district court litigation relating to handover procedures and testing equipment. Mobility Workx LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, No. 4:17-cv-00872 (E.D. Tex.).
• Represented a national telecommunications carrier in district court litigation involving 27 patents relating to 4G network infrastructure and devices. Sol IP LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, No. 2:18-cv-00526 (E.D. Tex.).
• Represented a global chemical manufacturing and engineering company in offensive district court litigation against a distributor of chemical products. Honeywell International Inc., v. MEK Chemical Corp., No. 3:17-cv-01390 (N.D. Tex.).
• Represented a national drywall manufacturer in district court litigation relating to additives used in drywall manufacturing. United States Gypsum Company v. New NGC Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00130 (D. Del.).

With experience at trial and in hearing determinations at the district court level and before the International Trade Commission, Karlee Wroblewski helps her clients during all stages of litigation with a keen eye toward trial strategy. Her experience across multiple technologies gives her the flexibility to assist clients in various industries.

Karlee received her J.D., summa cum laude, from Michigan State University and her B.S. in chemistry and Chinese studies from Furman University.

Bar Admissions

• North Carolina
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Education

• Michigan State University (J.D., 2019)
• Furman University (B.S., 2016)