Attorneys General Oppose Trump Administration’s Proposal to Rescind Biden-Era Oil and Gas Regulations in Alaska
August 4, 2025
Several attorneys general issued a comment letter to the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) opposing the agency’s proposal to rescind the 2024 Management and Protection Regulations of the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska, a Biden-era regulation that was implemented to protect Alaska’s natural resources and to mitigate reasonably foreseeable, adverse effects of proposed oil and gas activities in Alaska. The attorneys general assert that the 2024 rule is critical to protecting Alaska’s environment and contend that the rule’s removal would exacerbate climate change consequences throughout the state and beyond. The attorneys general comment letter ultimately urges the BLM to reverse its proposal to rescind the important 2024 rule.
Attorneys General File Lawsuits to Counteract Trump Administration’s Conditions on Funds for Emergency Services and Infrastructure
May 13, 2025
Several attorneys general filed suit against the Trump Administration for withholding federal emergency and infrastructure project funds unless states comply with the Administration’s federal immigration enforcement policies. One suit was filed against the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, and Secretary Kristi Noem to challenge the Administration’s refusal to disburse emergency preparedness and response funding to states without compliance. The second suit was filed against the Department of Transportation and Secretary Sean Duffy to challenge the Administration’s refusal to disburse public safety and transportation project funding to states without compliance. The attorneys general chiefly argue that federal immigration enforcement is the sole responsibility of the federal government and request that the courts enjoin the Administration from withholding critical emergency- and infrastructure-related funds to the detriment of states and their citizens.
Attorneys General File Lawsuit Challenging Vermont’s Climate Superfund Act
May 1, 2025
Several attorneys general filed suit against the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Climate Action Office to challenge to Vermont’s Climate Superfund Act (VCSA), which allows Vermont to recover damages from responsible parties whose actions allegedly impacted climate change in Vermont between 1995 and 2024. The attorneys general allege that the VCSA violates the U.S. Constitution, federal law, and the Vermont Constitution, including by potentially overreaching in its attempt to regulate interstate greenhouse gas emissions. The attorneys general chiefly argue that the VCSA may be Vermont’s attempt to regulate the nation’s energy infrastructure and ask the court to enjoin Vermont from enforcing the VCSA, among other relief.
State Attorneys General Request CEOs of Nation’s Top Companies to Abandon DEI Initiatives
April 15, 2025
Several attorneys general issued a letter to CEO members of the Business Roundtable, a nonprofit association of the nation’s top companies designed to help “develop and advocate directly for policies to promote a thriving U.S. economy and expanded opportunities for all Americans,” urging them to abandon their companies’ DEI initiatives. The attorneys general claim that DEI initiatives are harmful to businesses and consumers and allege that practices supporting DEI violate civil rights laws and breach fiduciary duties to their shareholders.
New Jersey’s Attorney General Climate Change Suit Dismissed as Preempted
February 5, 2025
A New Jersey superior court dismissed the state attorney general’s suit targeting fossil fuel companies for alleged deceptive practices related to climate change, ruling the state’s claims were preempted by federal law. The state attorney general had alleged eight state-law causes of action for harm from alleged interstate and international emissions, including failure to warn, negligence, impairment of the public trust, trespass, public and private nuisance, and violations of state consumer fraud law. In the court’s view, federal law preempts all the state’s claims, with interstate air pollution held to be an area of uniquely federal interest and foreign emissions being subject to federal common law. The attorney general has indicated that the state intends to appeal.
Eleven State AGs Warn of Potential Enforcement Actions for ESG and DEI Initiatives
January 27, 2025
Led by the attorney general of Texas, attorneys general for 11 states (Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Virginia) issued a letter to six high-profile financial firms, warning of potential enforcement action to address decisions made under ESG and DEI policies perceived to potentially violate federal and state laws. The letter asks firms to respond to inquiries into contracting, employment, alleged board and supplier quotas, and management of client assets, including participation in Climate Action 100+, Net-Zero Banking Alliance, and Net Zero Asset Managers initiatives, to assist the states in assessing whether violations have occurred, whether they will continue, and whether enforcement is necessary. The state AGs frame the requested response to the letter as an opportunity for the firms to avoid a lengthy enforcement action.
Attorneys General Urge Congress to Strengthen the Inflation Reduction Act to Protect and Increase Critical Domestic Energy Resources
January 16, 2025
A bipartisan coalition of attorneys general issued a letter urging Congress to affirm its commitment to safeguarding the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The attorneys general assert that the IRA is critical to bolstering the county’s infrastructure, diversifying the country’s energy resources, and significantly reducing harmful pollution in the environment. The IRA offers several substantial initiatives to encourage further investment in the country’s energy infrastructure and manufacturing, including the IRA’s Qualifying Advanced Energy Project Tax Credit, which the attorneys general credit for a private company investing hundreds of millions of dollars in a power transformer factory in North Carolina. The attorneys general cite several additional examples of the IRA helping fund or incentivizing significant investment in critical energy infrastructure while imploring Congress to protect and further develop the IRA and its regulatory progeny to help spur clean energy technology development and myriad economic benefits.
2024 Actions
View Actions ⮟
Arizona’s Attorney General Sues Farm Company for Substantial Groundwater Pumping
December 11, 2024
Arizona’s attorney general filed suit against Fondomonte Arizona LLC for alleged violations of Arizona’s public nuisance law. The complaint alleges that Fondomonte’s extraction of significant amounts of groundwater from the Ranegras Plain Basin primarily to grow alfalfa—a water-intensive crop—constitutes a public nuisance because it injures the Ranegras Basin community’s health, obstructs the community’s property use, and interferes with the community’s comfortable enjoyment of life and property. In the suit, Arizona’s attorney general complains that Fondomonte is extracting water at an unreasonable and excessive rate that, according to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, has already caused substantial subsidence in the Ranegras Basin. And if the water extraction is permitted to continue, the attorney general fears the Ranegras Basin community will need to abandon their homes and land for better access to quality water. For relief, the attorney general requests that the court enjoin Fondomonte from excessive groundwater pumping and establish an abatement fund, among other things.
Maine’s Attorney General Sues Oil Companies for Claims Concerning Fossil Fuel and Its Effect on Climate Change
November 26, 2024
Maine’s attorney general filed suit against several oil companies and a trade association for their claims about fossil fuel use and its effect on climate change. The complaint alleges that despite access to research showing that burning fossil fuels emits carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses, the companies misled the public about the impacts of using these fossil fuels, significantly contributing to climate-change-related harms in Maine. Maine’s attorney general complains that the companies’ actions constitute several violations of Maine common law, including negligence, nuisance, trespass, and violations of the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act. For relief, Maine’s attorney general requests that the court assess monetary damages against the companies and require the companies to abate the dangerous conditions alleged to have been caused by their fossil fuels in Maine, among other things.
D.C.’s Attorney General Reaches Settlement with Gas Company over Failure to Meet Solar Development Requirements
November 15, 2024
The District of Columbia’s attorney general announced a settlement with AltaGas Ltd. to resolve a breach of its merger agreement with Washington Gas, which required AltaGas to develop 10 megawatts of solar energy to offset Washington Gas’s greenhouse gas emissions. Under the settlement, AltaGas must pay an initial $2.1 million penalty to Washington, D.C. and additional monetary penalties that accrue daily until the solar capacity requirements are fulfilled, among other requirements. The first $2.1 million of the additional penalties will be paid into the District Department of Energy & Environment’s Renewable Energy Development Fund to help develop additional solar resources throughout Washington, D.C., with any excess penalties to be paid into the city’s general fund.
Bipartisan Coalition of Attorneys General Issues Call on FCC to Improve Efforts to Stop Illegal Robocalls
November 13, 2024
A bipartisan coalition of 46 attorneys general are calling on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to improve its Robocall Mitigation Database and help prevent bad actors from plaguing American citizens with robocalls and texts. Voice service providers must register with the FCC’s database to operate in the United States. The coalition argues, however, that the database does not sufficiently prevent bad actors from obtaining legitimate registrations by filing inaccurate, false, or misleading information. The coalition proposes significant changes to the FCC’s database and its operation—including vetting information from voice service providers and penalizing providers that submit false information—to improve the database’s accuracy and efficiency while minimizing bad actors’ ability to take advantage of the database and the American people.
State Attorneys General Urge the Federal Government to Protect American Drivers from Foreign Interference
October 24, 2024
Several state attorneys general issued a comment letter urging the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security to finalize and issue its proposed rule to secure information and communications technology and services in connected vehicles. The rule seeks to define a connected vehicle as a mechanically powered vehicle (not including rail line cars) manufactured primarily for use on public streets “that integrates onboard networked hardware with automotive software systems to communicate via dedicated short-range communication, cellular telecommunications connectivity, satellite communication, or other wireless spectrum connectivity with any other network or device.” The attorneys general contend that malicious actors—including foreign adversaries—may exploit the technology in connected vehicles to access sensitive data stored on vehicle systems; gather geolocation and behavioral data in sensitive environments (such as military bases); and spy, monitor, and surveil passengers through sensors and cameras outside the vehicle, among other things. The attorneys general encourage the bureau to finalize its proposed rule as soon as possible to ensure passengers in connected vehicles are adequately protected from harm.
Montana Attorney General Issues Civil Investigative Demand Against Investment Firm for Ratings of Israeli Companies
August 28, 2024
In re Investigation of MSCI Inc.
Montana’s attorney general issued a civil investigative demand against MSCI Inc., an investment firm, for reducing the ESG ratings of Israeli companies for their actions to support Israel in the Israel-Palestine conflict while not reducing the ratings of other non-Israeli institutions that are operating in regions rife with human rights violations. The attorney general requested that MSCI produce documents involving more than 17 different subject areas for Montana’s chief legal officer to investigate whether MSCI violated Montana’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act. The attorney general reported that he is prepared to prosecute MSCI to the fullest extent of the law if any violations were substantiated.
Virginia Attorney General Issues Opinion Prohibiting Virginia Retirement System from Making ESG-Based Investment Decisions
August 16, 2024
Virginia Attorney General opinion #23-062
Virginia’s attorney general issued an opinion that asserts Virginia law prohibits the board of trustees of the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) from making investment decisions based on ESG policies over financial considerations. The attorney general commented that Virginia law requires the board to discharge its duties solely in the interest of VRS beneficiaries, which, the argument goes, creates a fiduciary duty of loyalty to VRS beneficiaries. The opinion ultimately concluded that instead of ESG-based policies, the VRS board must make investment decisions that secure the best financial results for VRS beneficiaries.
California Attorney General Files Amicus Brief to Support SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rule
August 15, 2024
State of Iowa v. SEC, No. 24-1522 (8th Circuit Court)
California’s attorney general filed an amicus brief in the Eighth Circuit to support the SEC’s climate disclosure rule, which requires companies regulated by the SEC to provide certain climate-related information in their registration statement and annual reports – including, in certain instances, disclosures on severe weather events and other natural conditions. Under the final disclosure rule, SEC-regulated entities must provide information about any climate-related risks that have or are reasonably likely to materially impact their business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. The attorney general supports the disclosure rule because California suffers the economic effects of climate-related natural disasters and the rule will help California-based investors make more informed investment decisions. According to the amicus brief, the disclosure rule can also help guard against “greenwashing,” which occurs when an entity makes a misleading or deceptive claim of environmental responsibility.
Amendments to Illinois Human Rights Act Backed by Illinois Attorney General Signed into Law
August 12, 2024
HB5371
Illinois’s attorney general and the Illinois Department of Human Rights, along with state legislative stakeholders, collaborated to amend the Illinois Human Rights Act to further enhance protections against discrimination in housing and employment. In addition to clarifying important terms, the amendments further enhanced the attorney general’s authority to investigate “broad, systemic problems or incidents of discrimination” and remedy those violations via lawsuits. The amendments are also positioned to help victims of discrimination confidentially report discriminatory and hateful incidents and collect judgments more efficiently.
Arizona Attorney General Sues Automobile Manufacturers over “Super Clean” Truck Claims
July 18, 2024
State of Arizona v. FCA US (Supreme Court, Arizona)
Arizona’s attorney general filed suit against two automobile manufacturers – Cummins Inc. and FCA US LLC (formerly Fiat Chrysler Automobiles) – for alleged violations of the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act. The attorney general claims that the two manufacturers falsely marketed, advertised, and sold model year 2013–2019 Ram 2500 and 3500 trucks equipped with 6.7-liter diesel engines that included illegal auxiliary emission control devices (known as defeat devices), which detect when vehicles or engines are undergoing testing for EPA certification and reduce the vehicle’s or engine’s emissions output during testing to ensure emissions compliance but ultimately result in increased nitrogen oxide emissions during normal use. According to the complaint, the two manufacturers knowingly and falsely advertised that their vehicles were “super clean” and eco-friendly and employed clean diesel technology and then sold these vehicles for premiums under the guise that the vehicles were compliant with all EPA emissions criteria. The attorney general ultimately requests that the two manufacturers be enjoined from advertising and selling the affected vehicles in Arizona and that they compensate affected Arizona customers.
Several State Attorneys General Defend Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives Within Educational, Legal, Business Communities
June 20, 2024
Several state attorneys general drafted a comment letter addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives within legal and business communities. The letter from the attorneys general challenges attempts to correlate diversity measures with racial discrimination, among other things, and ultimately concludes by establishing the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and efforts in corporate, educational, legal, and philanthropic spaces. One key point the attorneys general make is that “companies with diverse leadership teams are associated with higher financial returns, and higher social and environmental impact scores.” The letter follows a letter from a separate group of attorneys general challenging the American Bar Association’s standards for approval of law schools after the Supreme Court’s recent decisions on the constitutionality of considering race in higher education admissions.
Several State Attorneys General Oppose New Federal Rule on Environmental Standards for Infrastructure
May 21, 2024
Several state attorneys general filed suit against the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), challenging the CEQ’s final rule implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that would require federal agencies to consider a variety of environmental and related factors—including climate change, environmental justice, and Indigenous Knowledge—when conducting environmental reviews under NEPA, among other things. The attorneys general contend that the proposed changes are arbitrary, without a valid federal statutory basis, and likely to result in uncertain and unpredictable outcomes. The attorneys general ultimately request, in relevant part, that the district court declare the final rule arbitrary and capricious, set aside the final rule, and enjoin the CEQ from implementing the final rule altogether.
Several State Attorneys General Petition District Court to Defend EPA’s Rule on Federal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards
April 23, 2024
Several state attorneys general moved to intervene in a case brought by attorneys general from other states that challenges the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final rule raising greenhouse gas emissions standards for light- and medium-duty vehicles (e.g., passenger cars, large pickup trucks, vans). The EPA’s final rule would impose more stringent standards on greenhouse gas and other harmful pollutant emissions (e.g., nitrogen oxides, particulate matter) for light- and medium-duty vehicles with model years 2027 and later. The EPA estimates that, if implemented, its final rule would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 7 billion metric tons through 2055.
The attorneys general seeking to intervene in the case argue that their right to intervene and defend the EPA’s final rule is well established since harmful emissions that threaten public health and the environment would exacerbate the climate change and public health harms their states have already experienced. The attorneys general opposing the EPA’s final rule did not oppose the motion to intervene in this case.
In a separate case, several attorneys general present similar arguments to intervene in a case brought by attorneys general from other states that challenges the EPA’s final rule raising greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy duty vehicles (e.g., freight trucks, delivery trucks, buses, shuttles, street sweepers). The attorneys general opposing the EPA’s final rule either did not oppose the motion to intervene or took no position on the motion.
District Court Blocks Federal Agencies’ Net-Zero Highway Emissions Rule
April 1, 2024
A federal district court in Kentucky found that the U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) highway emissions rule exceeds the FHWA’s statutory authority and is arbitrary and capricious. The rule, if implemented, would require states receiving funds from the FHWA to measure greenhouse gas emissions and establish declining CO2 targets for on-road emissions to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. In broad strokes, the court’s reasoning is two-fold. First, the rule, as currently written, would allow the federal government to usurp state sovereignty and authority. Second, the rule advances no lawful goal, especially since the plaintiff states insist they would not seek to achieve declining CO2 emissions from their national highway system roadways.
Although the court granted the states’ motion for summary judgment on the issue, the court declined to grant their request to vacate the rule or permanently enjoin its enforcement. Rather, the court limited its ruling to the 21 states since the rule “operates on a state-by-state basis, with no one state’s compliance or coercion affecting that of any other state.” The court also highlighted that litigation from other jurisdictions could further complicate its ruling and requests that the parties file supplemental briefs on a more well-adjusted remedy.
The 21 states implicated in this decision are Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
Comments on GSA Proposed Regulation re: Reduction of Single-Use Plastic Packaging
February 27, 2024
Several state attorneys general drafted a comment letter that supports the U.S. General Services Administration’s (GSA) proposed rule to reduce federal purchases of single-use plastic packaging. In their comment letter, the AGs both express support for the GSA’s efforts to limit the federal government’s procurement of single-use plastics and urge the GSA to develop a more stringent proposed rule that would eventually permanently eliminate the federal government’s ability to procure and acquire single-use plastics.
Preliminary Injunction Attempts to Halt DOT & FHWA Highway Emissions Rule
January 12, 2024
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Federal Highway Administration, No. 5:23-cv-00162 (W.D. Ky.)
Several state attorneys general filed a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) from implementing and enforcing their highway emissions rule. The emissions rule would require states receiving funds from the FHWA to measure greenhouse gas emissions and establish declining CO2 targets for on-road emissions to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. The AGs challenge the rule under several legal doctrines, including that the rule is arbitrary and capricious, and ultimately assert that the rule does not adequately consider the far-reaching impacts of the rule on states with more rural areas and growing populations.
Challenge Issued to DOC Draft "Business Diversity Principles"
January 8, 2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Notice Entitled Business Diversity Principles, 88 Fed. Reg. 83,380 (Nov. 29, 2023), DOC-2023-0003
Several state attorneys general drafted a comment letter that challenges the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (DOC) draft “Business Diversity Principles,” which seek to advance “best practices related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) in the private sector.” In their comment letter, the AGs assert that the draft violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and other legal doctrines. The AGs oppose the DOC’s rule and hope to work with the DOC to draft new guidance on DEIA practices in the private sector.
2023 Actions
View Actions ⮟
Several State Attorneys General Petition Congress to Defend a Company’s Right to Consider ESG Factors When Making Investment Decisions
December 14, 2023
Several Attorneys General wrote a letter to the United States Congress requesting that Congress defend fund managers’ use of ESG factors when developing investment strategies. In their letter, the Attorneys General asserted that ESG factors can be critical to prudent investment decision-making, especially considering that not all ESG-based investment opportunities prioritize environmental and social policy preferences over returns. In fact, the Attorneys General explicitly expressed that their letter does not advocate for using ESG factors to promote policy goals. Rather, the Attorneys’ General position is that integrating ESG factors into investment decision-making can help maximize returns for investors while also helping companies hedge against risks present in fluctuating natural environments and financial markets. The Attorneys General ultimately sought Congress’s help in protecting investor returns and the broader economy by ensuring fund managers can consider a broad range of information when making investment decisions.
Several Attorneys General Appeal Decision Upholding Federal Rule that Allows ESG Investments
October 26, 2023
Several Attorneys General announced their decision to appeal a federal district court decision that upheld the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) rule that would allow investment fund managers to direct funds to ESG investments. The Attorneys General asserted that the rule runs counter to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and exceeds the DOL’s authority. The Attorneys’ General appeal is currently pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Texas Attorney General Issues Guidance to State Government Entities Regarding Texas’ Laws Prohibiting Contracts with Companies Maintaining ESG and other Restricted Policies
October 17, 2023
Texas’ Attorney General issued an advisory letter explaining that a recent string of Texas laws restricts government entities from doing business with companies that boycott energy companies, discriminate against firearm entities or associations or boycott Israel. In the advisory letter, the Attorney General identifies several entities that, due to the string of recent laws, Texas state agencies and political subdivisions will not be able to contract with for certain goods and services. The Texas Attorney General further explains that government entities may not blindly rely on a company’s written verification in lieu of considering other, publicly available evidence when evaluating whether they can do business with companies in Texas. Such publicly available evidence, according to the Texas Attorney General, can include membership in or public partnership with the Net Zero Alliance or any other entity that espouses a commitment to ESG policies. The Texas Attorney General ultimately advises that Texas law requires government entities to exercise due diligence in upholding and enforcing the Texas-specific restrictions.
Virginia AG Warns the NZFPSA of Potential State and Federal Law Violations
September 13, 2023
State of Virginia Office of Attorney General, Attorney General Miyares Warns Financial Firms over ESG Collusion
Virginia’s attorney general led efforts to warn the Net Zero Financial Service Providers Alliance (NZFPSA) that some of its practices may violate state and federal law. In particular, the attorney general coalition expressed concerns that the NZFPSA’s goal to align its services and products to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, to implement the terms of the Paris Agreement, and to publicly report its collective efforts toward these goals could: (1) result in an artificial and potentially unlawful restraint of trade or commerce; (2) unlawfully mislead consumers and other persons about conflict of interest issues and the climate-related agenda’s viability; and (3) result in undue, widespread market manipulation with potentially detrimental effects. The AG coalition requested that the NZFPSA provide written responses to the coalition’s concerns.
Kentucky Challenges EPA’s Rule on Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Its Homegrown Coal-Fired Power Plants; California Supports It
August 9 & August 10, 2023
State of Kentucky Office of Attorney General, Attorney General Cameron Stands Up for Kentucky Coal, Again
State of California Office of Attorney General, Attorney General Bonta Supports EPA’s Proposed Rule Regarding Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants
Kentucky’s attorney general joined a challenge to the EPA’s proposed rule that would cut greenhouse gas emissions by several thousand metric tons (several million for certain gas types) from fossil-fuel-fired power plants through the next several years. The AG asserted that the EPA’s proposed rule would require Kentucky’s coal-fired power plants to either adopt potentially unreasonably expensive technologies or cease operation altogether due to the new emission standards. The AG noted that Kentucky’s coal plants generate a substantial amount of energy for the state and warned that the proposed rule may have a detrimental impact on the statewide, and then national, electric grid. The AG’s challenge comes after California’s attorney general joined efforts to support the proposed rule and advocated for standards that would help industries achieve the emissions standards more quickly.
Arkansas AG Appoints Longtime Political and Legal Figure to ESG Oversight Committee to Help Determine Who Discriminates Based on ESG Factors
July 31, 2023
State of Arkansas Office of Attorney Genera, Attorney General Griffin Names Former Senate Parliamentarian and Chief Legal Counsel to ESG Oversight Committee
Arkansas’s attorney general appointed a longtime Arkansas political and legal figure to the state’s new ESG Oversight Committee, which was created “to determine a list of financial services providers that discriminate against energy, fossil fuel, firearms, or ammunition companies or otherwise refuse to deal based on environmental, social justice, and other governance-related factors.” If a company is included on the ESG Oversight Committee’s list, Arkansas must divest its direct and indirect holdings with the company and the state will be prohibited from investing its cash funds with the company. Arkansas’s treasurer will maintain the most updated list of companies that are violating Arkansas Act 411, the law that created the ESG Oversight Committee, on the official website.
2022 Actions
View Actions ⮟
North Carolina Attorney General Awards Nearly $700,000 in Grants to Support Environmental Efforts in North Carolina
December 1, 2022
State of North Carolina Office of Attorney General, Attorney General Josh Stein Announces More Than $685,000 in Environmental Grants for Eastern NC
North Carolina’s attorney general (AG) announced $685,327.21 in grants to various recipients, including Eastern Carolina University, the City of New Bern, and The Conservation Fund, to preserve natural resources and help support work to ensure clean air and water in eastern North Carolina. The grants were awarded through the Environmental Enhancement Grant program, which began as a collaboration between the North Carolina AG’s Office and Smithfield Foods. Smithfield provides $2 million to the state every year to fund environmental projects across North Carolina.
Attorneys General Petition the SEC to Reopen Comment Period on ESG and Climate Investing Rules
October 24, 2022
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Reopens Comment Periods for Several Rulemaking Releases Due to Technological Error in Receiving Certain Comments
Several state attorneys general (AGs) petitioned the SEC to extend the reopened comment period for multiple rulemaking releases and requests for comment after the SEC reported it never received some public comments submitted through its internet comment form due to technological errors. In response to the lost comments, the SEC reopened the comment period on 11 rulemaking releases and one request for comment for 14 days. The state AGs contend that this shortened comment period does not adequately ensure interested parties can comment on the SEC’s rules.
Montana’s AG points out that this shortened comment period may be troubling since some of the rulemaking releases contain updates on ESG investment practices and a climate disclosure rule. The state AGs assert that these and similar proposed rules may reorder companies’ priorities from maximizing shareholder returns to improving climate reputation and may violate the First Amendment and exceed the SEC’s statutory authority.
Multistate Coalition of Attorneys General Investigates Major Banks for Their Involvement with Foreign Banking Alliance and ESG Investment Strategies
October 19, 2022
State of Virginia Office of Attorney General, Attorney General Miyares Joins 19 State Coalition in Launching Investigation into Six Major Banks over ESG Investing
A multistate coalition of attorneys general (AGs) served civil investigative demands on several major banks to subpoena documents relating to the banks’ involvement with the United Nations’ Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA). The NZBA requires its member banks to set emissions reduction targets in their investment and lending portfolios to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. This investment strategy has been coined “ESG investing” for its potential focus on environmental, social, and governance factors rather than solely focusing on maximizing shareholder returns. Virginia’s AG joined the coalition to ensure Virginia farmers and companies that deal with fossil-fuel-related activities are not punished and to investigate whether these major American banks have ceded their authority to a foreign body.
Attorneys General Submit Formal Comments Against the Federal Highway Administration’s Proposed Rule Requiring Net-Zero Highway Emissions
October 13, 2022
State of Montana Office of Attorney General, Attorney General Knudsen Fights Biden Administration Rule Requiring States to Reach Net-Zero Highway Emissions
Several state attorneys general (AGs) formally commented on the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHA) proposed rule that would require states to measure greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and establish declining GHG emission targets for on-road emissions to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. For example, Montana’s AG asserts that the proposed rule both exceeds the FHA’s authority to regulate GHG emissions and fails to adequately consider the major questions doctrine, which generally requires an agency to have clear congressional authorization to decide an issue of major national or political significance.
In addition to arguing that the proposed rule is an issue of major significance – and thus violates the major questions doctrine – the state AGs also contend that the proposed rule violates federalism principles and the Appropriation Clause and resembles rules previously repealed for being burdensome and duplicative.
California Attorney General Guides Local Jurisdictions on Mitigating Wildfire Risks in New Development Projects
October 10, 2022
State of California Office of Attorney General, Best Practices for Analyzing and Mitigating Wildfire Impacts of Development Projects Under the California Environmental Quality Act
California’s attorney general issued guidance to local jurisdictions on best practices to disclose, analyze, and mitigate wildfire risks in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and to encourage local jurisdictions to think proactively about reducing wildfire risks while accommodating future housing and development needs.
The wildfire-risk guidance discusses several variables, including (1) Project Density (how project density influences how likely a fire is to start or spread and how likely a development and its occupants are to be endangered by fire); (2) Project Location in the Landscape (how project placement interacts with topography, fuel, climatic conditions, and fire weather to influence fire risk); and (3) Water Supply and Infrastructure (whether there are adequate water supplies and infrastructure, including the potential loss of water pressure and power, to address firefighting needs within the project site). Those variables should be considered when analyzing a development project’s impact on wildfire risk.
The guidance also strongly encourages local jurisdictions to engage in evacuation modeling and planning when analyzing how new projects may impact the evacuation efforts of project occupants and their neighbors and whether emergency responders could simultaneously access the area to fight wildfire – especially for projects located in high-wildfire-risk areas with an increased risk of ignition and evacuation impacts. Further, the guidance offers several practical measures to help jurisdictions comply with CEQA’s requirement to adopt all feasible mitigation measures, including installing undergrounding power lines, placing projects close to emergency services, and enforcing parking limitations to ensure access roads are not clogged during an emergency.