AI Quarterly June 2026

AI Quarterly | A Review of AI Law, Policy & Practice | 2026 Q2

Our AI Quarterly publication brings together the firm’s latest AI focused practical insights, key developments, and upcoming programs all in one place, including relevant writings, events, and firm news.

Insights

New Executive Order Promotes AI Innovation While Strengthening Cybersecurity Defenses

On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed the Executive Order “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” The Order reflects the Administration’s stated policy of advancing U.S. AI leadership through collaboration with the private sector, while taking steps to harden government and critical infrastructure systems against emerging cyber threats. Importantly, the Order maintains the Administration’s approach of favoring voluntary, industry-collaborative mechanisms over mandatory regulatory mandates, expressly disclaiming any authority to create licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirements for the development or distribution of AI models.

Fannie Mae Issues Governance Framework on Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

On April 8, 2026, Fannie Mae issued a governance framework for Fannie Mae seller/servicers’ use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) in their origination and servicing practices. The requirements that Fannie Mae sets forth in this directive are considerable and apply to all approved single-family seller/servicers using AI/ML technologies within their loan origination or servicing practices. The directive becomes effective on August 6, 2026, 120 days after publication.

Produce the Prompts: A Court Says Expert AI Inputs Are Fair Game in Discovery

A federal court just delivered one of the clearest messages yet on AI in litigation: If an expert used AI to do the work, the prompts may be discoverable. In Conservation Law Foundation Inc. v. Shell Oil Company, Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish ordered the plaintiff to produce the prompts its expert used in preparing her report, treating them as part of the expert’s methodology rather than protected drafting material. That puts AI prompts squarely into the discovery fight.

NYDFS Issues Frontier AI Advisory and Guidance for Heightened Cyber Threat Environment

On May 21, 2026, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) issued two industry letters to the organizations it regulates: “Heightened Cybersecurity Risks Associated with Frontier AI Models” and “Guidance on Measures Regulated Entities Should Consider in a Heightened Cybersecurity Threat Environment.” The letters discuss various recommended security controls regulated entities should consider in light of a heightened cybersecurity threat environment (defined as a period when “cybersecurity risks are significantly elevated and therefore have a high likelihood of impacting Information Systems, Nonpublic Information or operations”) and in light of the threats presented by frontier AI models (defined as AI models that “amplify the potency, scale, and speed of identifying vulnerabilities and exploits in information systems”).

European Commission Publishes Draft Guidelines on Classification of High-Risk AI Systems Under the EU AI Act

On May 19, 2026, the European Commission published draft guidance on how to determine whether an AI system qualifies as a high-risk AI system (HRAIS) under the EU’s AI Act, Regulation 2024/1689. The draft reflects input from stakeholders and EU Member States through the EU AI Board and represents the most detailed interpretative material issued to date on this topic.

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act—Creating New Trails for AI Rules and Private AI Litigation

On May 12, 2026, the Colorado legislature passed SB 26-189, which repeals and replaces its landmark Artificial Intelligence Act. Colorado is doing away with the concept of “algorithmic discrimination” and moving instead to a notice- and disclosure-based regime focused on automated decision-making. This time, it does so without a carve-out for deployers that are small businesses.

The Era of AI-Driven Data Breaches Has Arrived

A recent lawsuit signals the rapid convergence of issues involving artificial intelligence, vendor-managed platforms, and individual arbitration in the data breach ecosystem. In Woodard v. OpenAI Inc. & Mixpanel Inc., No. 3:25-cv-10301 in the Northern District of California, the plaintiffs alleged that Mixpanel uses AI technologies developed by OpenAI to collect user data. Mixpanel’s data collection came to a head in November 2025, when it was hit by a third-party criminal cyberattack that allegedly impacted consumers’ OpenAI accounts on the Mixpanel platform.

One Federal Privacy Bill to Rule Them All?

On April 21, 2026, Republican lawmakers on the House Energy & Commerce Committee, including Brett Guthrie and John Joyce, M.D., leader of the Energy and Commerce Data Privacy Working Group, introduced the Securing and Establishing Consumer Uniform Rights and Enforcement over (SECURE) Data Act. The Act is designed to create a comprehensive nationwide framework governing consumer privacy and personal data protection in the United States. The Act would significantly reshape the U.S. privacy landscape by establishing uniform consumer rights, clarifying obligations for businesses nationwide, and displacing much of the current state-by-state regime.

Your AI Chats May Be Used Against You—CEO’s ChatGPT Records Appear in Judicial Opinion Concerning $250 Million Earnout

On March 16, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an opinion finding that the CEO of a major gaming company followed guidance from ChatGPT to breach a $500 million acquisition agreement. This dispute joins a growing list of cases in which chatbot records have entered the courtroom as evidence against users.

Your AI Scribe May Be Taking Notes (and Plaintiffs Are Too)

On April 7, 2026, several plaintiffs filed a class action complaint in the Northern District of California against Sutter Health, Memorial Health Services Inc., and Memorial Care Medical Foundation. The complaint alleges the providers illegally recorded the plaintiffs’ confidential medical information by using an AI-powered “ambient clinical documentation” tool to record clinician-patient conversations during medical visits. This suit may highlight a growing litigation risk for the health care systems deploying conversational AI technologies, as well as processes and patient consents that can mitigate such risks.

New York AI Disclosure Bill Passes State Legislature

New York state Assembly Bill A3411B passed its third reading in the Senate on March 9, 2026, sending it through the legislature and preparing it for delivery to Governor Kathy Hochul. If enacted, the bill will require owners, licensees, and operators of generative AI systems to display a clear and conspicuous notice on system user interfaces that generative AI outputs may be inaccurate. The bill now awaits delivery to, and signature by, Hochul. If signed, it will become effective 90 days after becoming law.

Publications

Events

Press Releases

Daily Report Highlights Alston & Bird’s IP Bench Expansion to Meet Growing AI-Driven Demand

A Daily Report article highlighted Alston & Bird’s continued investment in its nationally recognized Intellectual Property Group as demand grows at the intersection of artificial intelligence and IP law. Natalie Clayton and John Haynes, co-chairs of Alston & Bird’s Intellectual Property Group, commented on how AI is driving demand for sophisticated legal services across copyright, patents, and litigation. Notably, the firm is strategically expanding its capabilities in these areas and recently added three new partners who focus on disputes involving digital media, AI, and emerging technologies. Michael Elkin and Sean Anderson joined the firm’s New York office, and Jennifer Golinveaux joined in San Francisco.


 For additional updates, please visit our Privacy, Cyber & Data Strategy Blog.

You can subscribe for future updates by completing our 
publications subscription form.


Media Contact
Alex Wolfe
Communications Director